Legitimacy Debt: The Erosion of Professional Judgment in Human-AI Accounting
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/esensi.v29i1.490Accounting firms increasingly report that AI adoption improves measurable performance, even as separate evidence points to a decline in the judgment capacity that professional licensure presupposes. This article develops a conceptual explanation for why both can be true at once. Following a theory-synthesis method, it integrates five theoretical traditions, human-AI symbiosis, virtue ethics, institutional theory, governmentality, and sustainability accounting, into a single mechanism. It introduces legitimacy debt, the accumulated gap between the judgment institutions still recognize as belonging to accountants and the judgment those accountants can still exercise, and presents a revised SIGMA model specifying the conditions under which this debt forms, stays concealed, and is eventually repaid. The article traces the mechanism through developmental displacement, in which task substitution erodes the practice that builds professional judgment, and through miscalibration under algorithmic visibility, in which both excessive trust and excessive discounting of AI output produce the same failure of proportionate judgment. Six falsifiable propositions link these mechanisms across individual, organizational, and profession-wide levels, with Indonesia examined as a boundary condition that reveals the double-edged role of collective deliberation. The article offers accounting research a testable construct for a phenomenon current frameworks describe only partially, and reframes integrity as a designable organizational infrastructure rather than an individual disposition, with direct implications for accounting education, firm practice, professional standards, and regulation.
Keywords: Accounting Ethics Artificial Intelligence Integrity Infrastructure Legitimacy Debt Professional Judgment SIGMA Framework
Ahrens, T., & Ferry, L. (2021). Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1332–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659
Ahyaruddin, M., Yusoff, M. N. H. bin, & Zainuddin, S. A. binti. (2023). Institutional Isomorphism, Accountability, and Local Government Performance in Era of Public Governance: A Conceptual Framework (pp. 623–633). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27296-7_57
Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean Ethics (L. Brown & D. Ross (eds.)). Oxford University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. W. W. Norton & Company.
Commerford, B. P., Dennis, S. A., Joe, J. R., & Ulla, J. W. (2022). Man Versus Machine: Complex Estimates and Auditor Reliance on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12407
Cornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond Compare: Metaphor In Organization Theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378876
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Efferin, S., & Hopper, T. (2007). Management control, culture and ethnicity in a Chinese Indonesian company. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(3), 223–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.009
Elish, M. C. (2019). Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 5, 40–60. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.260
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Erin, O. A., & Bamigboye, O. A. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of SDG reporting: evidence from Africa. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0025
Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 938–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x
Gray, R. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism: An exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90038-T
Harun, H., Eggleton, I. R. C., & Locke, S. (2020). An integrated model of IPSAS institutionalisation in Indonesia: a critical study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2020-0195
Hulland, J. (2020). Conceptual review papers: revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00168-7
IESBA. (2023). Final Pronouncement: Technology-related Revisions to the Code. The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/final-pronouncement-technology-related-revisions-code
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1), 18–26.
Jones, S., & Free, C. (2026). What accountants need to know about artificial intelligence and machine learning: a review and call for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 48(5), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-12-2025-0693
Jussupow, E., Benbasat, I., & Heinzl, A. (2024). An Integrative Perspective on Algorithm Aversion and Appreciation in Decision-Making. MIS Quarterly, 48(4), 1575–1590. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2024/18512
Kristjánsson, K., Fowers, B., Darnell, C., & Pollard, D. (2021). Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Type of Contextual Integrative Thinking. Review of General Psychology, 25(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211023063
Lehner, O. M., Ittonen, K., Silvola, H., Ström, E., & Wührleitner, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence based decision-making in accounting and auditing: ethical challenges and normative thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4934
Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-1(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
Lukka, K., & Vinnari, E. (2014). Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(8), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1265
MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149000000001
Modell, S., Vinnari, E., & Lukka, K. (2017). On the virtues and vices of combining theories: The case of institutional and actor-network theories in accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 60, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.06.005
Morley, J., Elhalal, A., Garcia, F., Kinsey, L., Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics. Minds and Machines, 31(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w
Rogošić, A., & Perica, I. (2023). Affective professional commitment and accounting ethics principles: examining the mediating role of the code of ethics. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2077791
Santoni de Sio, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (Fourt Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Seethamraju, R., & Hecimovic, A. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Management, 48(4), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221108440
Senellart, M., Ewald, F., & Fontana, A. (2009). Security, Territory, Population. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245075
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
West, A., & Buckby, S. (2023). Professional judgement in accounting and Aristotelian practical wisdom. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(1), 120–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4949
